Public workers, private patrols in New Hartford

Town contracts out police to mall, theater, hospital


Observer-Dispatch
Posted Nov 28, 2009 @ 11:12 PM
Last update Nov 28, 2009 @ 11:13 PM

NEW HARTFORD —

Every weekend, New Hartford police officers can be seen patrolling heavily populated buildings throughout the town, including a mall, theater and hospital.

But the town isn’t footing the bill for this security. Instead, the Police Department contracts out its officers to patrol private entities — a practice that brings in nearly $60,000 a year.

New Hartford Police Chief Ray Philo believes the custom enables him to provide better protection in privately operated locations that are open to the public, and he pointed out that departments across the state are doing the same thing.

“They are asking for an extra dimension of policing we can’t give them with normal patrol,” Philo said. “We are not giving police protection to Marquee (Cinemas), we are giving protection to the public.”

However, the state Attorney General’s Office and a local citizens group have raised questions about the legality of the agreements.

“Police protection is owed to the public at large,” a March 26, 1988 Attorney General’s Office opinion states. “Like any governmental function, police protection may not be provided by contract to private parties.”

Since 1993, New Hartford police have provided weekend evening patrols at Sangertown Square and Faxton-St. Luke’s Healthcare’s St. Luke’s campus. The department also has offered the service for other events that take place within the town borders.

But it was the contract the department signed in December 2008 with West Virginia-based Marquee Cinemas that’s brought the practice into the spotlight.

Though a New Hartford police officer has been stationed at the theater at The Orchard shopping center every Friday, Saturday and Sunday evening for almost a year, the issue never was brought to the Town Board for a vote.

Legality of contracts

Though its opinions are not binding, the Attorney General’s Office has been clear in its objection to police departments’ contracts with private entities.

An opinion dated June 14, 1974, said the practice goes against the state Constitution.
“I know of no statutory authority allowing a town to provide police services on contract for private persons or organizations,” the opinion states.

Officials from the Attorney General’s Office provided the opinions last week but did not comment on the issue.

Murray Jaros, special counsel to the state Association of Towns, said towns could make their own rules about such situations.

“No state agency has any true jurisdiction over this situation because it is a matter within the local government’s discretion to decide what services it is going to provide,” he said.

New Hartford Town Attorney Gerald Green did not return calls about the issue.

Town Supervisor-elect Patrick Tyksinski said the town had allowed the police to provide such services for a long time, and town attorneys had examined the issue.

“At least from that standpoint, it passed the litmus test,” he said. He will review the Attorney General’s Office opinions, he said.

The Oneida County Sheriff’s Office and the Whitestown Police Department also sometimes contract out police patrols, but have different practices from New Hartford police. The Utica Police Department, however, recently ceased doing work for private entities because of concerns about liability.

The section of the town code that addresses the Sangertown and St. Luke’s contracts states that “the rendering of such services by the town of New Hartford police is within the purview of the police protection rendered to the town of New Hartford.”

The code, however, does not elaborate on what guidelines should exist if the department provides the service to entities other than Sangertown or St. Luke’s.

‘Can of worms’?

St. Luke’s and Sangertown each reimburse the town $33 an hour for patrols. Marquee’s rate is the amount of the officer’s pay — including overtime — plus $20 per night for the car, Philo said.

The department doesn’t make a profit from the fees, he said.

But to Catherine Lawrence, co-founder of Concerned Citizens for Honest and Open Government, these contracts are an issue of fairness — she pointed out smaller businesses also might be vulnerable but unable to afford the added protection.

“I just think it opens a real can of worms,” Lawrence said. “Is that the business they want to be in? To rent a police car for anyone who wants it for the night?”

Private security guards generally can’t make arrests, nor do they carry guns, so having officers on patrol enhances public safety, Philo said.

The St. Luke’s campus has its own 24-hour security guards, but also has a New Hartford police officer stationed there at busy times such as weekend evenings, hospital officials said in a statement.

“There are many stresses and challenges for patients and their families in a health care setting,” said Robert Sylvester, director of Safety and Emergency Preparedness for the healthcare provider. “Many times, the simple presence of an officer will help to maintain a calmer atmosphere.”

St. Luke’s is expected to pay the town about $23,000 for that police presence in 2010, the town budget shows.

A spokesman for Sangertown did not return calls. The mall is expected to pay the town $14,560 next year for police.

Marquee agreement

Lawrence said she had concerns about the lack of transparency involving the Marquee agreement.

The contract, signed in December 2008 by Lt. Timothy O’Neill, puts an officer at the multiplex cinema from 8 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. every Friday, Saturday and Sunday evening.

But it never was approved by the Town Board.

Town officials said they were researching the legality of the agreement, and Town Supervisor Earle Reed said he couldn’t comment further on the issue.

Rich Woodland said guidelines are needed to outline how to handle similar situations in the future.

“We should have procedures in place and have good accountability for all department heads to know exactly when they need to approach the board for board approvals that way there is no misunderstands and everyone is on the same page,” Woodland said.

Philo said he didn’t think it was necessary for him to bring the contract, which has brought the town about $13,500 since it was established, to the board because he believed the situation was temporary.

Marquee entered into similar arrangements at its locations nationwide after a robbery-murder at one of their cinemas last year, Philo said.

Marquee Cinemas did not return repeated phone calls.

Tyksinski said the board and supervisor should be involved in these agreements.

“I think the Town Board needs to know what the situation is and whether they want to commit those resources to that sort of function,” he said.

Board member Christine Krupa agreed.

“Any contract that expends town funds must be approved by the Town Board and signed by either the town supervisor or, in his absence, the deputy town supervisor,” she said.

Board member David Reynolds said he believes the practice makes sense as long as town costs are covered.

Other concerns

Lawrence and Krupa expressed concern that the officers’ overtime pay would cost the town in the long run, with issues such as retirement costs.

Employee pensions are based on earnings, and if police are racking up overtime, it could come back to bite taxpayers, Lawrence and Krupa reasoned.

Philo, however, called those contentions “ridiculous.”

He said officers who did the contractual services usually are newer to the department. Pensions are based on an officer’s three highest-paid years, and a young officer’s salary wouldn’t come close to what an officer might make after 20 years of service, Philo said.

He also said he rotates the officers on those patrols, so no one is getting all the overtime. Also, the work always is done as overtime and does not take away from normal town patrols, Philo said

Philo stressed that the practice of having the town Police Department patrol private entities protects the public while saving tax dollars.

“This is problem-solving policing,” he said. “It’s providing policing and offsetting some of the cost from the taxpayers.”
 


Copyright © 2009 GateHouse Media, Inc. Some Rights Reserved.
Original content available for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.