New Hartford town and village disagree over police commission

 

By ELIZABETH COOPER

Observer-Dispatch

Posted Apr 26, 2010 @ 01:02 PM

Last update Apr 26, 2010 @ 09:15 PM

NEW HARTFORD

The village of New Hartford and the town of New Hartford might be heading for a legal battle over the abolition of the town Police Commission.

In February, the Town Board abolished the Police Commission in a 3-2 vote.

On Monday, Village Mayor Don Ryan said he and other village officials had been told of the town’s decision the same day the commission was abolished, and they had not had time to negotiate or react.

After mulling their options, he and Village Attorney Gustave DeTraglia Jr. met with Town Supervisor Patrick Tyksinski and brought with them draft legal papers they might file if the town won’t change the situation.

Their position:

o         The establishment of the police commission was a key part of a 1982 memorandum of understanding in which the town agreed to provide police protection for the village. The village abolished its own police department at that time.

o          If the town arbitrarily abolishes one of the agreement’s stipulations, village officials are concerned there would be nothing to stop it from abolishing others.

“Next step, they could take the police car out of the village,” Ryan said. “Next it’s, ‘provide your own police protection.’”

Therefore, the village is requesting that the town either re-establish the Police Commission or create an advisory board with similar functions.

Tyksinksi said he would discuss the situation at Wednesday’s regularly scheduled Town Board meeting.

Legal threat?

Village officials insist they didn’t threaten legal action when they met last Thursday with town officials, but that’s not the impression Tyksinski had.

“They walked into my office with the papers already drawn,” Tyksinski said. “They hadn’t filed them, but the papers were drawn.”

DeTraglia, however, disagreed.

“I drafted the papers for my own use, to organize our thoughts,” DeTraglia said. “Only if things don’t get resolved would we have to make it formal and actually file it.”

Ryan said the same.

“There was no threat,” he said. “We just had a conversation, and I thought we had a nice conversation and a good meeting of the minds.”

DeTraglia said the village had fourmonths from the town’s Feb. 10 abolition of the commission to take legal action.

The agreement

At the time when the village and town police departments merged nearly 30 years ago, neither side wished to cede total control over the police force to the other.

Creating the Police Commission to oversee police operations was an important part of the compromise, village officials have said.

In the 1982 memorandum of understanding, the establishment of the commission was the second of nine stipulations.

Town officials defend their action by citing state law that states town boards have the right to create and abolish police commissions.

Village officials, however, contend that the memorandum constitutes a contract between the two municipalities, and that supersedes other laws.

The memorandum expired Dec. 31, 1983. Village officials, however, point to a 2004 decision by then-State Supreme Court Justice Robert Julian that refers to an agreement between the village and town for police services.

Town Board members react

Town Board members Christine Krupa and Don Backman both said they did not want to see the town go back to having the same sort of police commission it used to have.

“I have no problem with an advisory board, and that was something we were going to revisit,” Krupa said. But I would not go back to a police commission as defined under New York State Town Law.”

Backman said he would advocate setting up an advisory board whose main function was to address complaints against the police department, and would be overseen by the town board.

Board member Rich Woodland Jr., said he thought the town had acted too quickly in abolishing the commission and said he liked the idea of putting something comparable back into place.

Board member David Reynolds said he would support either reinstating the commission or creating a new advisory board.

“I think the whole issue could have been handled differently,” he said.

Copyright 2010 The Observer-Dispatch. Some rights reserved