Read what interests you, but you may see a surprise


Observer-Dispatch
Posted Jul 20, 2008 @ 12:05 AM

A recent Sunday afternoon found me comfortably settled in a lounge chair, pen in hand and the Observer-Dispatch crossword puzzle ready to go. 

I started with the “across” clues. I thought I knew the answer to the first, but it didn’t fit in the allocated boxes, so I moved on to the next clue. And the next. And then the next, with the same frustrating result. 

Rarely – if ever – have I been able to complete an entire puzzle in one run-through. But usually, I can muddle my way through with correct answers here and there. 

So I thought I’d try a different approach, and moved to the “down” clues. These were even worse. And I started to wonder if maybe I needed to call for an appointment for one of those mental acuity tests. 

But then the math part of my brain kicked in. And I realize the clues didn’t match the boxes. There was no 8-across; there were no clues for 24 and 26-down. And then the logic part of the brain engaged: Aha! The grid was not the match for the clues. 

I called the office – even publishers get to make complaint calls to the newsroom – and learned the New York Times syndicate had sent out the wrong puzzle. They claimed they’d sent a correction, but we – and dozens of other newspapers – never received it. 

What struck me as funny, though, was how few calls we received that Sunday about our mangled puzzle. Many people told us – the next day – that they breathed a sigh of relief when they learned that the grid was the wrong one for the clues. 

Apparently, folks who do crossword puzzles tend to be older; many do puzzles because they think it will keep them mentally fit, and none wanted to admit that they might be losing it. 

We often get calls from people with a complaint, who begin by telling us they “only” read the paper for ... you name it, the puzzle, the obits, the comics, the sports, whatever. I think we’re supposed to be chastened by such comments; there’s usually a sub-text accusation along the lines of “there’s nothing else in there that interests me.” 

We respect that different readers pick up the newspaper for different reasons. 

Ideally, we hope every reader peruses every square inch of the paper, every story, every cutline, every ad. But there aren’t enough hours in the day for anyone to do that with any paper. 

And that’s OK. 

Newspapers are, by their very design, a great big variety store of news and information. Not in the market for a pet? Then skip that part of the Classifieds. Hate baseball? Then you probably don’t give a whit for coverage of the All-Star game. 

Find a particular opinion columnist annoying? Then skip that column. 

But as you flip through, and over, the many different pages of the newspaper, no doubt you’ll find something else of interest. 

Sure, maybe you turned first to the obit page, but en route, you might have spotted something on the Local news cover that interested you. Or noticed an interesting feature on the Your Life page. Or found an ad for something you never realized you needed, or wanted, but now you’re thinking it just might make life perfect. 

Read what interests you. If there’s something you’d like covered that we seem to be missing, let us know. And if the puzzle’s wrong, call us. At the very least, we can commiserate about arcane clues. 

Donna Donovan is publisher of the Observer-Dispatch. Contact her at ddonovan@uticaod.com.