Guest view: More cuts necessary to get New Hartford on right track


Observer-Dispatch
Posted Oct 31, 2009 @ 11:56 PM

The past several weeks have brought numerous inquiries regarding the declining fund balance within the town of New Hartford and the need in 2010 for a 54 percent property tax increase.

Therefore, I wanted to share my views and conclusions on where the town financial plan is today and what it might be in 2010.

In today’s dollars, a home assessed in New Hartford in 1999 at $150,000 paid $300 in town property taxes for all town services we enjoy, such as police protection, beautiful parks, a library, a senior nutrition site and road maintenance. In 2009, that same house paid $329, or just an increase of $29, a 10 percent increase over 10 years. It wasn’t reasonable to believe that the town could continue sustaining inflationary increases in salaries, benefits and utilities without having similar increases in revenues and thus began the progression of utilizing the town’s fund balance instead of raising property taxes.

The reason for the large decrease in the fund balance and the significant tentative property tax increase being recommended is due primarily to the simple fact that a portion of everyday town expenditures were budgeted to be paid from our fund balance (savings account) when expenditures could have been reduced and annual property tax increases should have been proposed and implemented. The town’s sales tax revenues were not meeting expectations during that period and further drained the fund balance to an anticipated $150,000 by the end of 2009.

Additionally, many challenges confronted our town in recent years with a convergence of mitigating factors. The bottom was falling out of our economy, affecting our sales tax projections, bank interest on all our deposits was dramatically decreasing, health insurance was experiencing double digit increases and the price of gas soared.

The town did have significant progress in aspects related to quality of life residents have come to expect, such as initiating a nuisance abatement law, successfully defeating the power line installation by New York Regional Interconnect, upgrades to the town’s court system, and completing storm water drainage projects on Oxford Road and Jubilee Estates. The library expansion, Rayhill walking trail, completion of a dog run and improvements to the Veterans Memorial Park Gateway added to the services many residents continue to utilize and enjoy.
During the same period, we were able to retain The Hartford’s 500 jobs through relocation to the New Hartford Business Park, as well as having worked with the Sitrin Home for their expansion and the successful court challenge regarding the Preswick Glen tax status.

All that said, hindsight is always 20/20 and it is apparent to me that we should have hired a comptroller several years ago. That comptroller could have provided financial projections that might have predicted the need for property tax increases within the past several budgets, as well as having outlined necessary cuts in expenditures and reductions in sales tax revenue estimates instead of relying upon the fund balance to balance the annual budgets

Let me be clear: The 54 percent property tax increase that is being recommended within the 2010 tentative budget may have no impact on fund balance reserves in 2010. Possible consolidation, attrition through not filling positions when they become vacant and the active pursuit of new revenue sources are not the only answers to increasing our reserves. Every department head and board member has been challenged to provide further cuts to the 2010 tentative budget in an effort to bolster our town’s fiscal foundation and future so that core services our residents expect and deserve will not be adversely affected in 2010.

Earle C. Reed is supervisor of the town of New Hartford.


Copyright © 2009 GateHouse Media, Inc. Some Rights Reserved.
Original content available for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.