New Hartford school project back within cost estimates

Some aesthetics eliminated; other re-bid estimates also lower


Observer-Dispatch
Posted Jul 30, 2008 @ 11:23 PM

NEW HARTFORD —

A second round of bidding last month helped bring construction costs for the New Hartford Central School District’s Triple A Capital Project back in line with original estimates, Superintendent Daniel Gilligan said Wednesday.

Initial bids opened by the district June 18 put the construction costs at more than $23 million, after the district originally budgeted for closer to $20 million. Those initial bids were especially troublesome, Gilligan said, because the district had left some wiggle room in its budget to begin with.

COSTS
Construction bids for the New Hartford Central School District’s $25.7 million capital project were awarded Wednesday. The top three construction costs were:
  • General Construction: $9.9 million to Bette & Cring Construction Group
  • Electrical: $3.5 million to Ridley Electric Company
  • Heating/Ventilation/AC: $2.8 million to H. J. Braneles Corp.
Additional bids were awarded for plumbing, roofing, theater lighting, theater lighting integration, and theater equipment at a combined cost of $2.3 million. There also are site work and architectural fees.
“Our board, based on two independent estimates, was $1 million to the good,” he said. “To be $1 million to the good and find out you’re 20 percent off is a little shocking.”

In order to get the project back under budget, the board decided to make several changes to the original designs and then rebid the work. The major changes were:

  • Eliminating a new entranceway planned for the Bradley Elementary School.
  • Using paneling instead of bricks on the exterior of the auditorium fly space.
  • Eliminating a second-floor hallway between the high school and the new math, science and technology wing.

Officials said those elements were chosen because of their primarily aesthetic nature.

Gilligan described the planned entranceway, for example, as “a very nice thing to have but not critical to the project.”

The district’s goal, he added, was to preserve the nature of the athletic field, auditorium and math, science and technology wing as they were promised to voters prior to the bond vote in December 2006.

Bids for the amended project were opened July 23 and awarded at a special school board meeting Wednesday. In addition to the money saved by the above changes, Gilligan said, other costs also came in lower the second time around.

Six companies were chosen to do the work, which was broken down into a total of eight categories for the bidding process. The largest category, general construction, was awarded to Bette & Cring Construction Group for just under $10 million. Other contracts went to H.J. Brandeles Corp., Ridley Electric Company, Pulver Roofing Company, BMI Supply and Syracuse Stage & Lighting, the board said.

The total cost of the bids was about $18.5 million. When added to an additional $1.7 million in preliminary site work awarded previously, that leaves the district well within its original budget estimate for construction, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs Robert Nole said.

The remainder of the $25.7 million capital project consists of additional costs such as architectural and legal fees.

Gilligan said he believes the higher-than-expected initial bids were due primarily to current petroleum and steel prices, as well as contractors protecting themselves against the possibility of those prices continuing to rise in the future. When initial estimates for the capital project were done in 2006, those items were significantly cheaper than they are now.

Original estimates also may have been off slightly due to the preliminary nature of the plans on which they were based. District Plant Engineer Andrew Morgan said the conceptual work done by architects prior to the bond vote amounted to only 5 percent or 10 percent of the total architectural work needed for the project. But Nole said that is true for all school capital projects and he does not believe it had an impact.

“Legally, any school district in New York state can only incur costs for conceptual designs prior to voter approval,” Nole said. “Once the voters approve it, that’s when the architects go through and develop all the designs.”
Primary construction was delayed for three weeks due to the extended bidding process but will still proceed on roughly the same schedule as original expected, officials said. The athletic field will be completed by fall 2008, the auditorium by summer 2009, and the math, science and technology wing by spring 2010.
Gilligan said he hopes the experience the New Hartford district had with its project can serve as an example for other local schools, such as Whitesboro and Utica, as they begin soliciting bids for their capital projects
“Don’t be afraid to go right back out again, because it seems to keep everybody sharper with their pencil,” he said.