Observer-Dispatch
Posted Apr 16, 2009 @
09:42 PM
It’s not
wrong for school districts and the municipalities they serve to work together
on cooperative ventures. We need more of that as costs rise and governments
seek ways to keep taxes down.
But when such ventures are done outside of the public purview, it becomes a
problem.
That’s what has happened in the case of
Taxpayers had no say in the deal, but are now the ones who will pay to maintain
and develop the site. And this is just three years after taxpayers voted down a
similar proposal on the other side of town.
The
Though the school district got the land “for free,” it is now responsible for
it, and that expense falls on taxpayers. And it’s not really “free” land. When
owned privately, it was on the tax rolls. Now as school district property, it’s
tax-exempt. That’s less money for the district, which will have to be made up
by taxpayers.
Second, there’s no plan for developing this land. Former schools Superintendent
Daniel Gilligan, who put together the planning committee that raised the funds,
hopes the land can be developed to improve recreational opportunities for all
New Hartford residents. What that might cost is anybody’s guess. A similar
situation presented itself in 2006 when the New Hartford school district wanted
to purchase 87 acres off
The latest deal cut the public out of the land-acquisition option. And by
taking this back-door approach, taxpayers are kept in the dark on things they
have a right to know.
Consider the land appraisal. Since it was done for a “private foundation,” the
public is being denied access to a copy of the appraisal on land it now owns.
Foundation co-president Marcia Archibald said her group had the appraisal done
on behalf of the private donors. She said Linda Romano, a local lawyer whose
family donated $40,000, told her she did not want the information released.
According to Archibald, Romano said “it’s no one’s business, that it doesn’t
matter.”
It most certainly is the public’s business. They own the land. And that
matters.
Even school superintendent Robert Nole said he doesn’t know who did the
appraisal. Really? Wouldn’t that be information the school superintendent and
school board would want to know before they accepted this “gift?”
The bottom line is this: Whenever public leaders — and there were a lot of them
involved here, including several school board members — are dealing on behalf
of the taxpayers, they have a moral and ethical obligation to conduct business
openly. Without transparency, trust is lost.
In this instance, the New Hartford Central School Education Foundation provided
a vehicle to privatize a deal that should have been public. It took power from
the majority and placed it in the hands of a few.
And that’s just wrong.
Copyright © 2009 GateHouse Media, Inc. Some Rights Reserved.
Original content available for non-commercial
use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted.